Hi Mom,
I just got that second copy of the New Yorker [she sent the wrong one the first time]. I was actually wondering where all the political stuff was you referred to in the first one. Ironic that the one “political” article I found happened to echo my own thoughts from the primary about UHC.
I thought the Woody Allen piece was hilarious. He takes some health food store “memory pills” because he can’t find his car keys, and then remembers a whole stream of consciousness chain of details all the way back to what was playing on the car radio when he was born in the back seat — or something like that. (I need memory pills, too)
I’ll check out this new issue and will likely let you know what I think. (why must you provoke me?) I notice there’s an article by Ryan Lizza who (ironically, again) wrote the piece inside that infamous “Barack and Michelle cover” issue that was completely overshadowed and ignored because of it. An excerpt from it:
“[P]erhaps the greatest misconception about Barack Obama is that he is some sort of anti-establishment revolutionary. Rather, every stage of his political career has been marked by an eagerness to accommodate himself to existing institutions rather than tear them down or replace them….he has always played politics by the rules as they exist, not as he would like them to exist. He runs as an outsider, but he has succeeded by mastering the inside game.”
I remember thinking at the time that the cover might have been an editorial choice on someone’s part to sabotage the prominence of their own story. (I know, sounds far fetched. It’s more likely they are just blissfully unaware of how many irony challenged people there are out there) That article was one of the only attempts (as far as it went) I recall in a main stream publication to objectively analyze Obama’s early political career, and probably would have been controversial (as far as it went) if not for the cover being more so.
Courage, T
Posted by thenotionthatsomehow
Posted by thenotionthatsomehow